| 752 | 9 | 30 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在荷兰的政策讨论与实践中,一个反复出现的主题就是努力创建混合的社区。在二战后的最初几年,基本的问题不是混合群体而是混合功能:通过混合各种不同的功能,诸如居住、工作和娱乐等,使地区内的居民能够开展各种活动而不用被迫离开。20世纪60年代,功能分区的理念取代了把地区看作是所有功能和人口混合在一个有限空间里的社会单元的理念,居住、就业和交通职能被分离开。20世纪70年代和80年代,荷兰大城市中建于二战前的贫穷地区开展了大型的城市更新运动。在此期间,居住混合并不是一项明确的目标。到20世纪80年代末,一项新的住房政策开始占据主导。城市重构成为关键词:在社会租赁住房占据主导的地区,大量房屋不得不拆毁或更新,以便为那些价格更高的、通常是个人所有的住房留下空间。通过这种方式就可以抵制低收入家庭的高度集中。自2001年以来,关于社会混合的争论一直在变换论调。在此之前,这场争论和政策都已经在社会经济用语中得到体现和表述。2001年之后,与少数族裔在空间上集聚相关的问题变得尤为突出。
Abstract：a recurrent theme in the Dutch policy discourse and practice is the strive for creating mixed neighbourhoods. In the first years after the Second World War the basic issue was not mixing groups, but mixing functions; by mixing different kinds of functions, such as housing, work, and recreation, the inhabitants would have much of their activity patterns in the district so that they did not have to leave the area. In the 1960s the idea of the district as a social unit, with all its functions and people mixed in a limited space, was replaced by the idea of functional separation. Housing, work, and transport were separated. In the 1970s and 1980s large-scale urban renewal activities were undertaken in the deprived pre-WWII areas of the large Dutch cities. In this period, the residential mix was not an explicit target. By the end of the 1980s a new housing policy became dominant. Urban restructuring became the key word: a large number of social rented dwellings in the areas that were dominated by this housing segment had to be demolished or upgraded, in order to make room for more expensive, often owneroccupied dwellings. In this way, concentrations of low-income households could be countered. Since 2001 the debate on the social mix changed in tone. Until then the debate and the policies had been conducted and expressed in socioeconomic terms. After 2001, the problems associated with spatial concentrations of minority ethnic groups were featured explicitly.
[1]Dekker K,R van Kempen.Urban Governance Within the Big Cities Policy:Ideals and Practice in Den Haag,the Netherlands[J].Cities,2004,21(2):109-117.
[2]Van Kempen R,G Bolt.Social Cohesion,Social Mix,and Urban Policies in the Netherlands[J].Journal of Housing and the Built Environment,2009,24(4):457-475.
[3]Wagenaar C.Town Planning in the Netherlands Since1800[M].Rotterdam:010Publishers,2011.
[4]Bos A.De stad der toekomst,de toekomst der stad[The Future of the City,the City of the Future][M].Rotterdam:A.Voorhoeve,1946.
[5]Van der Horst H,Kullberg J,L Deben.Wat wijken maakt[What Makes Neighbourhoods?[M].Utrecht/Den Haag:Nethur/DGW,2002.
[6]Goodchild B,I Cole I.Social Balance and Mixed Neighbourhoods in Britain since1979:A Review of Discourse and Practice in Social Housing[J].Environment&Planning D:Society and Space,2001,19(1):103-122.
[7]Schuiling D.Stadsvernieuwing door de jaren heen[History of Urban Renewal][M].Rooilijn,2007,40(3):158-165.
[8]Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment.Volkshuisvesting in de JarenNegentig[Housing in the1990s][M].The Hague:Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment,1989.
[9]Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment[EB/OL].[14February2008].http://international.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=7336.
[10]Van Kempen R.Big Cities Policy in the Netherlands[J].Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie,2000,91(2):197-203.
[11]Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment.Nota stedelijkevernieuwing.[Memorandum on Urban Renewal][M].The Hague:Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment,1997.
[12]Van Beckhoven E,R Van Kempen.Social Effects of Urban Restructuring:A Case Study in Amsterdam and Utrecht,the Netherlands[J].Housing Studies,2003,18(6):853-875.
[13]Musterd S,W Ostendorf.Integrated Urban Renewal in the Netherlands[J].Urban Research&Practice,2008,1(1):78-92.
[14]Ministry of Justice.Jaarnotaintegratiebeleid2005[Yearly Memorandum on Integration Policy][M].The Hague:Ministry of Justice,2005.
[15]Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment[EB/OL].[14February2008].http://international.vrom.nl/pagina.html?id=10712.
[16]Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment.Actieplankrachtwijken:van aandachtswijknaarkrachtwijk[Action plan for strong districts:from attention district to strong district][M].The Hague:Ministry of Housing,Spatial Planning and the Environment,2007.
[17]Ministry of the Interior.Woonvisie[Vision on Housing][M].The Hague:Ministry of the Interior,2011.
[18]GiltayVeth D.Het rendement van zalmgedrag[The Effectiveness of Salmon Behaviour][M].The Hague:Nicis Institute,2009.
[19]Aalbers M B,E van Beckhoven.The Integrated Approach in Neighbourhood Renewal:More than Just a Philosophy[J].Tijdschriftvoor Economische en Sociale Geografie,2010,101(4):449-461.
[20]Visitation Commission Neighbourhood Policy.Doorzetten en loslaten[Persist and release][R].The Hague:Visitation Commission Neighbourhood Policy,2011.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU981
引用信息:
[1]吉迪恩·博尔特,罗纳德·凡·肯彭,买静,等.荷兰的社会混合与城市政策[J].国际城市规划,2013,28(03):8-12.
2013-06-19
2013-06-19