| 2,248 | 85 | 353 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
弄清可达性测度方法对公共设施公平研究具有重要意义。本文系统地比较了物理可达性与时空可达性两大类测度方法,前者是基于地方的、考察设施与个体日常生活位置之间的物质空间邻近度方法,受距离、交通方式或设施数量、质量影响,主要用于1970—1990年代的空间公平研究。后者是基于人的、考察个体使用设施机会的大小,受时间、空间、机动能力、偏好(NUM、NUMD、DUR)及设施质量(BAGG)等影响,主要用于21世纪以来偏重个体差异的社会公平研究。不同测度方法对公平问题的解释内容和机制不同,NUM、DUR、BAGG更适于质量异质的设施(如公园、学校、医院等),而NUMD适于质量均质的设施(如办公部门、消防站、邮局等)。最后以基本可达性方法为基础,介绍4种典型的综合公平分析模型在公共设施公平研究中的应用。
Abstract：Accessibility is the widest measuring tool in the equity of urban public facilities research. It's very important to understand what factors affect those accessibility measures and what methods they rely on. The article compares the basic principles and indicators of the various accessibility measures. The measures of Physical Accessibility are place-based and indicate the physical spatial proximity, influenced by the distance(DMIN), the transport mode(TMIN), the number(NUM) or quality of facilities(GRAV). Those methods were mainly used in the spatial equity during 1970s-1990 s. The measures of Space-time Accessibility are people-based and indicate the feasible opportunities, influenced by the limit of time, space, motility, behavior, preference(NUM, NUMD, DUR) and quality of facilities(BAGG). Those methods are mainly used in the social equity since 2000 s.The different measures have different contents in explaining equity. Those measures such as NUM(DUR) BAGG are proper to the quality heterogeneity facilities and NUMD is the quality homogeny facilities. At last, the article indicates the applicability for the equity analysis based on four types of equity models.
[1]Talen E,Anserine L.Assessing Spatial Equity:An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds[J].Environment and Planning A,1998,30:595-613.
[2]Knox P.The Intra-urban Ecology of Primacy Medical Care:Patterns of Accessibility and Their Policy Implications[J].Environment and Planning A,1978(10):415-435.
[3]Pacione M.Access to Urban Services:The Case of Secondary Schools in Glasgow[J].Scottish Geographical Magazine,1989,105:12-18.
[4]Truelove M.Measurement of Spatial Equity[J].Environment and Planning C,1993(11):19-34.
[5]Neutens T,Delafontaine M,Schwanen T,et al.The Relationship Between Opening Hours and Accessibility of Public Service Delivery[J].Journal of Transport Geography,2011(3):1-13.
[6]刘晓霞,王兴中.城市社区的社区资源公正配置研究[J].人文地理,2008(2):39-43.
[7]尹海伟,徐建刚.上海公园空间可达性与公平性分析[J].城市发展研究.2009,16(6):71-76.
[8]江海燕,周春山,肖荣波.广州公园绿地的空间差异及社会公平研究[J].城市规划,2010(4):43-48.
[9]高军波,周春山,江海燕,等.广州城市公共服务设施空间分异研究[J].人文地理,2010,25(3):78-83.
[10]陈洁,陆锋,程昌秀.可达性度量方法及应用研究进展评述[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(5):100-110
[11]宋正娜,陈雯,张桂香,等.公共设施空间可达性及其度量方法[J].地理科学进展,2010,29(10):1217-1224.
[12]Miller H J.Place-based versus People-based Geographic Information Science[J].Geographical Compass,2007,1:503-535.
[13]Neutens T,Schwanen T,Witlox F.et al.Social Equity of Public Service Delivery:A Comparison of Different Accessibility Measures[J].Environment and Planning A,2010,42:1613-1615.
[14]Kwan M P.Space-time and Integral Measures of Individual Accessibility:A Comparative Analysis Using a Point-based Framework[J].Geographical Analysis,1998,30:191-216.
[15]Miller H J.Measuring Space-time Accessibility Benefits Within Transportation Networks:Basic Theory and Computational Procedures[J].Geographical Analysis,1999,31:187-212
[16]Neutens T,Delafontaine M,Scott D M et al.A GIS-based Method to Identify Spatiotemporal Gaps in Public Service Delivery[J].Applied Geography,2012,32:253-264.
[17]江海燕,周春山,高军波.西方城市公共服务空间分布的公平性研究进展[J].城市规划,2011,35(7):72-77
[18]Omer I.Evaluating Accessibility Using House-level Data:A Spatial Equity Perspective[J].Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2006(30):254-274.
[19]Ko Wan Tsou,Yu Ting Hung,Yao Lin Chang.An Accessibility-based Integrated Measure of Relative Spatial Equity in Urban Public Facilities[J].Cities,2005,22(6):424-435.
[20]Hsueh-Sheng Chang,Chin-Hsien Liao.Exploring an Integrated Method for Measuring the Relative Spatial Equity in Public Facilities in the Context of Urban Parks[J].Cities,2011,28(5):361-371.
[21]关美宝.时间地理学研究中的GIS方法:人类行为模式的地理计算与地理可视化[J].国际城市规划,2010,25(6):18-26.
[22]柴彦威,张文佳,张艳,等.微观个体行为时空数据的生产过程与质量管理[J].人文地理,2009(6):1-9.
[23]赵莹,柴彦威,陈洁,等.时空行为数据的GIS分析方法[J].地理与地理信息科学,2009,25(5):1-5.
[24]顾朝林.论构建和谐社会与发展社会地理学问题[J].人文地理,2007(3):7-11.
[25]袁媛,吴缚龙.基于剥夺理论的城市社会空间评价与应用[J].城市规划学刊,2010(1):71-77
[26]杨滔.新区域主义在新大伦敦空间总体规划中的诠释[J].城市规划,2007,31(2):19-23.
[27]Talen E.New Urbanism,Social Equity,and the Challenge of Post-Katrina Rebuilding in Mississippi[J].Journal of Planning Education and Research,2008(27):277-293.
[28]Kevin M,Ahmed M E.Who Benefits from New Transportation Infrastructure?Evaluating Social Equity in Transit Provision in Montreal[R].Paper presented at the 57th Annual North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association,2010(9):1-24.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU984
引用信息:
[1]江海燕,朱雪梅,吴玲玲,等.城市公共设施公平评价:物理可达性与时空可达性测度方法的比较[J].国际城市规划,2014,29(05):70-75.
基金信息:
教育部人文社会科学青年基金(10YJC840036);; 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室基金(2011KB08)联合资助
2014-04-21
2014-04-21
2014-04-21