| 1,328 | 0 | 1120 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
社交媒介与城市空间的“虚实互动”已成为一些地区城市更新的重要特征，但当前研究对虚实关系和媒介作用的认知尚不全面。本研究通过梳理整合“从实到虚”“从虚到实”“虚实混合”三种路径，建立了虚实互动的城市更新分析框架，并以朝天宫街道为例解析机制演进：（1）虚拟符号建构向实体具身访问延伸，启动了分散自主更新；实体集聚格局与虚拟热点链接相互促进，引发了街巷串联更新；“媒介凝视”固化多元共治的社会纽带，推进了街区协商更新。（2）社交媒介实现了载体与主体间的转换与兼容，一方面承载公众愿景表达、商家路线营销、游客身份展演和政府方案宣传，传播空间印象、热点格局、引流规律；另一方面通过算法控制强化虚拟链接，施加“媒介凝视”塑造虚实地方感。（3）社交媒介激发了市场活力，推动了公众参与，吸引了政策关切，使城市更新从分散走向整合、从自下而上走向上下联动，应因势利导有序推进。
Abstract：The “virtual-physical interaction” between social media and urban space has become an important feature of urban regeneration in some regions, but the current research on the virtual-physical relationship and the role of media is not comprehensive. This paper sorts out three paths: “from reality to illusion”, “from illusion to reality”, and “mixed reality and illusion”, and constructs the virtual-physical interaction framework to investigate the evolutionary mechanisms of urban regeneration. Through an empirical analysis of Chaotiangong Street, three fundamental mechanisms are identified. First, spatial transformation progresses from virtual symbolic construction to physical embodied engagement, initiating decentralized regeneration that evolves into serial revitalization through the mutual reinforcement of physical clustering patterns and virtual hotspot linkages, ultimately consolidated by media-gaze-enabled multi-stakeholder governance. Second, social media operates dualistically as both a transmission channel disseminating spatial narratives(public aspirations, commercial strategies, tourist identities, and policy agendas) and an algorithmic apparatus shaping place perception through virtual-physical hybridization. Third, social media has invigorated market vitality, promoted public participation, and attracted policy attention. It has transformed urban renewal from being fragmented to integrated, and from a bottom-up approach to a model of collaboration between top-level and grassroots efforts, which should be guided and advanced in an orderly manner.
[1]彭兰.社会化媒体：理论与实践解析[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015:2.
[2]新华网.网红城市上新、宝藏小城出圈……几组数据看文旅发展新趋势[EB/OL].(2024-05-17)[2024-09-13]. http://www.news.cn/politics/20240517/25662cbe42ae4e5e9a0f19657d8f78df/c.html.
[3]周恺,曾文菁,张海涛.数字赋能城市更新下的业态导入及空间生产——以长沙丰盈西里的“网红空间”为例[J].西部人居环境学刊,2024, 39(4):53-59.
[4]周琳,陈晨,谢苑仪,等.上海历史地段城市更新“网红化”的空间生产机制研究——以长宁区愚园路更新改造为例[J/OL].国际城市规划,2024-07-31[2024-09-13]. https://doi.org/10.19830/j.upi.2024.463.
[5]曾凌霜,顾冰斌.新媒体时代城市更新的公众参与——以南京小西湖片区改造为例[J].城市地理, 2023(12):56-63.
[6]梁璐,符鸿燕,李九全,等.网红城市网络关注度时空动态演变及影响因素研究——以西安市为例[J].地理科学, 2022, 42(9):1566-1576.
[7]郭文琪.媒介朝觐：社交媒体中网红产品的塑造逻辑研究[J].新媒体研究, 2024, 10(3):88-91.
[8]SHELTON T, POORTHUIS A, ZOOK M. Social media and the city:rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information[J]. Landscape and urban planning, 2015, 142:198-211.
[9]MARTíP, GARCíA-MAYOR C, SERRANO-ESTRADA L. Identifying opportunity places for urban regeneration through LBSNs[J]. Cities, 2019,90:191-206.
[10]EILEEN W. Integrating social media for community empowerment:a study of community reporting in two greater Manchester urban regeneration areas[D]. Salford:University of Salford, 2013.
[11]WAYNE W, KRISTIAN R. Urban renewal and public participation in Sydney:unpacking social media strategies and use for contesting consensus[J]. Urban policy and research, 2019, 37(3):350-366.
[12]袁艳.当地理学家谈论媒介与传播时，他们谈论什么?——兼评保罗·亚当斯的《媒介与传播地理学》[J].国际新闻界, 2019, 41(7):157-176.
[13]ADAMS P C. Geographies of media and communication[M]. Chichester:John Wiley&Sons, 2009:1-12, 204-213.
[14]McQUIRE S. The media city:media, architecture and urban space[M].London:Sage, 2008:6-7.
[15]McQUIRE S. Geomedia:networked city and the future of public space[M].Cambridge, UK:Polity Press, 2016:13-18, 32-40.
[16]FALKHEIMER J, JANSSON A. Towards a geography of communication[M]//FALKHEIMER J, JANSSON A. Geographies of communication:the spatial turn in media studies. Gothenburg:Nordicom, 2006:7-8.
[17]王德,朱礼才淇,晏龙旭.移动网络使用特征及其虚实空间联动性研究[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 33(1):56-66, 77.
[18]邵世维,黄新,刘辉,等.利用基于位置的社交网络探究城市服务设施[J].地理空间信息, 2015, 13(6):23-25, 11.
[19]ARCIDIACONO C, GRIMALDI D, PROCENTESE F, et al. Participatory visual methods in the‘Psychology loves Porta Capuana’ project[J]. Action research, 2016, 14(4):376-392.
[20]姜早龙,李荷.老旧小区改造的公众关注热点及推进策略研究——基于文本挖掘技术[J].建筑经济, 2023, 44(1):29-36.
[21]CHEN J L, REN K L, ZHOU P. et al. Toward effective urban regeneration post-COVID-19:urban vitality assessment to evaluate people preferences and place settings integrating LBSNs and POI[J/OL]. Environment development and sustainability, 2024[2025-04-20]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-05378-8.
[22]方鹏飞,罗震东,毛茗.移动互联网时代中国城市网络营销的空间效应——基于抖音数据的实证[J].城市发展研究, 2023, 30(3):106-114.
[23]汪劲柏,穆艳霞,王治元.互联网时代城市空间运营热点地区的分布与发展特征研究——以上海“网红打卡地”为例[J].城市发展研究,2022, 29(10):19-26.
[24]江海燕,宋天昊,李世杰,等.数字化背景下城市虚实活力空间格局特征——以广州为例[J].热带地理, 2023, 43(4):695-706.
[25]周恺,张海涛,夏依宁,等.社交媒体影响下的城市消费空间新特征：以小红书长沙“网红打卡地”为例[J].现代城市研究, 2021(9):20-27.
[26]顾晋源,杨东峰.社交媒体影响下城市休闲空间分布新特征：基于小红书打卡地与POI的对比分析[J].地球信息科学学报, 2024, 26(2):332-351.
[27]GORDON E, MANOSEVITCH E. Augmented deliberation:merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning[J].New media&society, 2011, 13(1):75-95.
[28]张可,许可,吴佳霖,等.网红短视频传播对消费者旅游态度的影响——以丁真走红现象为例[J].旅游学刊, 2022, 37(2):105-119.
[29]周雯婷,丁哲璇,刘凌云,等.新媒体影响下仿制景观的兴起及其形象塑造：以佛山日本街为例[J].世界地理研究, 2022, 31(6):1155-1166.
[30]蒋晓丽,郭旭东.媒体朝圣与空间芭蕾：“网红目的地”的文化形成[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报), 2020, 42(10):12-17.
[31]COULDRY N. Media rituals:a critical approach[M]. London, New York:Routledge, 2003.
[32]周梦,卢小丽,朱静敏,等.媒介朝圣视角下非景区型网红旅游地的探索性研究[J].旅游科学, 2023, 37(1):59-74.
[33]何江夏,王雨村.苏州老城更新的绅士化发展进程及其对策研究[J].城市规划, 2018, 42(9):70-78.
[34]李杰文,王红扬.城市空间同质化问题的思辨与超越——以上海武康路项目为例[J].城市规划, 2024, 48(1):79-89.
[35]李达军.为什么红不久？网红商店的形成机理研究——基于多案例与语义网络分析[J].营销科学学报, 2024, 4(2):139-157.
(1)“虚拟在场”指通过网络社交媒介的浏览、互动行为而感到身临其境的状态；“身体在场”指设身处地在某地进行实践和体验的状态；“身份展演”指网络身份的主观构建和展示[7,30]。
(2)“转译”指行动者将他者的问题和兴趣用自己的语言进行转换，本研究中特指人类主体通过移动设备将物质环境中的空间要素符号化地表达在社交媒介中；“媒介凝视”指通过媒介手段对个体或群体进行观察和评价的过程[31~32]。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2024.632
中图分类号:TU984.114
引用信息:
[1]江璇,耿慧志,孙洁,等.社交媒介影响下虚实互动的城市更新机制解析——以南京市朝天宫街道为例[J].国际城市规划,2025,40(06):64-72.DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2024.632.
基金信息:
国家自然科学青年基金项目“大都市商业绅士化空间格局、形成机理与规划响应”（42101219）
2025-09-18
2025-09-18
2025-09-18