| 3,384 | 28 | 127 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
将艺术、科技、地方文化与丰富多元的社交环境相结合，以满足创新型人才需要的生活方式，是最近二十余年全球城市“筑巢引凤”和提升自身竞争力的主要路径，而舒适物在这一过程中发挥着关键作用。越来越多的国际研究表明，舒适物已成为驱动城市发展的重要因素。本文在梳理舒适物研究的英文文献基础上，提出以舒适物为导向的城市发展模型：首先，概述其理论意涵、模型特征和适用条件；其次，探讨舒适物对城市发展的作用，涉及舒适物与创新型人才增长、普通市民群体需求的关联；再次，聚焦国际研究争论的热点以及场景视角下的整合，继而分析舒适物导向下城市政策与规划的理论和实践；最后，展望舒适物研究的国际新趋势以及挑战。舒适物驱动城市发展作为一种城市研究新范式，有利于引导城市政策从关注产业发展的需要转向关注从事产业的人的发展需求，尤其是创新型人才在创新、消费、文化等方面的需求，从而吸引集聚高素质人力资本并促进城市发展由外生力量向内生动力转变。
Abstract：Combining art, technology, local culture and diverse social environment to meet the needs of creative talents has become an important pathway for global cities to attract advanced human capital and enhance competitiveness in the past 20 years. Amenities are key to this process. A rising number of international studies demonstrate that amenities have become an increasingly important driver of urban development. Through a systematic review of amenities research, this paper introduces an amenitiesoriented urban development model. First, it summarizes the model's theoretical meaning, characteristics,and applicable conditions. Secondly, it discusses the effect of the model on urban development, which involves the relationship between amenities as well as the growth of innovative talents and the needs of ordinary citizens. Thirdly, it focuses on key debates in international amenities research and integrates these debates from the perspective of “scenes”, and then analyzes the theory and practice of amenities-oriented urban policy and planning. Finally, new international trends and challenges of amenities research are prospected. As a new paradigm for urban research, amenities-oriented urban development is conducive to guiding the transition of urban policies from addressing the needs of industry development to the developmental needs of people involved in industries, especially the demands of innovative talents in creativity, consumption and culture, so as to attract and aggregate high-quality human capital, as well as to promote the transition of urban development dynamics from external forces to internal drivers.
[1]薛岚.国外乡村舒适性研究综述与启示[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(12):2129-2138.
[2] MOLOTCH H.The City as a growth machine:toward a political economy of place[J].American journal of sociology,1976(2):309-3 32.
[3]CLARK T N.The city as an entertainment machine[M].Lanham,MD:Lexington Books,2003:103-322.
[4]GLAESER E L,KOLKO J,SAIZ A.Consumer city[J].Journal of economic geography,2001(1):27-50.
[5]DELLER S C,LLEDO V,MARCOUILLER W D,Modelling regional economic growth with a focus on amenities[J].Review of urban and regional development studies,2008(20):1-21.
[6]马凌.城市舒适物视角下的城市发展:一个新的研究范式和政策框架[J].山东社会科学,2015(2):13-20.
[7]王宁.地方消费主义、城市舒适物与产业结构优化——从消费社会学视角看产业转型升级[J].社会学研究,2014,29(4):24-48,242-243.
[8]吴军.文化舒适物——地方质量如何影响城市发展[M].北京:人民出版社,2018.
[9]何金廖,曾刚.城市舒适性驱动下的创意产业集聚动力机制——以南京品牌设计产业为例[J].经济地理,2019,39(3):134-142,161.
[10]McNULTY R H,JACOBSEN D R,PENNE R L.Community futures and quality of life:a policy guide to urban economic development[M].Washington,D.C.:Partners for Livable Places,1985.
[11]ULLMAN E L.Amenities as a factor in regional growth[J].Geographical review,1954,44(1):119-132.
[12]SMITH D L.Amenity and urban planning[M].London:Crosby Lockwood Staples,1974,
[13]SILVER D A,CLARK T N.Scenescapes:how qualities of place shape social life[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2016:26-375.
[14]CLARK D E,KAHN J R.The social benefits of urban cultural amenities[J].Journal of regional science,1988,28(3):363-377.
[15]KLOOSTERMAN R C.Cultural amenities:large and small,mainstream and niche-a coceptual framework for cultural planning in an age of austerity[J].European planning studies,2014,22(12):1-16.
[16]CLARK T N,HOFFMANN-MARTINOT V,eds.The new political culture[M].Boulder:Westview Press,1998:11.
[17]WANG C H,WU J J.Natural amenities,increasing returns and urban development[J].Journal of economic geography,2011,11(4):687-707.
[18]CARLINO G A,SAIZ A.Beautiful city:leisure amenities and urban growth[J].Journal of regional science,2019,59(3):369-408.
[19]刘士林.城市中国之道——新中国成立70年来中国共产党的城市化理论与模式研究[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2020.
[20]GABRIEL S A,ROSENTHAL S S.Quality of the business environment versus quality of life;do firms and households like the same cities?[J].Reviewof economics and statistics,2014,86(1):438-444.
[21]RAPPAPORT J.The increasing importance of quality of life[R].Kansas City, KS:The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Research Department,2008.
[22]ASAHI C,HIKINO S,KANEMOTO Y.Consumption side agglomeration economies in Japanese cities[J].CIRJE(Center for International Research on the Japanese Economy)F-Series,2008,31(8):597-598.
[23] ALBOUY D.What are cities worth?land rents,local productivity,and the total value of amenities[J].Review of economics and statistics,2016,98(3):477487.
[24]KEELER Z T,HEATHER M S,BRAD R H,The amenity value of sports facilities:evidence from the staples center in Los Angeles[J].Journal of sports economics,2021,22(7):799-822.
[25]LLOYD R.Neo-Bohemia:art and neighborhood redevelopment in Chicago[J].Journal of urban affairs,2002,24(5):517-532.
[26]FLORIDA R.The rise of the creative class[M].New York:Basic Books,2002:59-401.
[27]McGRANAHAN D A,WOJAN T R,LAMBERT D M.The rural growth trifecta:outdoor amenities,creative class and entrepreneurial context[J].Journal of economic geography,2011,11(3):529-5 57.
[28] HAISCH T,KL?PPER C.Location choices of the creative class:does tolerance make a difference:[J].Journal of urban affairs,2015,37(3):23 3-254.
[29]FALCK O,FRITSCH M,HEBLICH S.The phantom of the opera:cultural amenities,human capital,and region al economic growth[J].Labour economics,2011,18(6):755-766.
[30]REYNOLDS C L,WEINSTEIN A L.Gender differences in quality of life and preferences for location-specific amenities across cities[J].Journal of regional science,2021,61:916-943.
[31]MUGHAN S,SHERROD HALE J,WORONKOWICZ J,Build it and will they come? the effect of investing in cultural consumption amenities in higher education on student-level outcomes[J].Research in higher education,2021,63:60-91.
[32]WHISLER R L,WALDORF B S,MULLIGAN G F,et al.Quality of life and the migration of the college-educated:a life-course approach[J].Growth and change,2008,39(1):58-94.
[33]KUANG C.Does quality matter in local consumption amenities?an empirical investigation with Yelp[J].Journal of urban economics,2017,100:1-18.
[34]SILVER D,MILLER D.Contextualizing the artistic dividend[J].Journal of urban affairs,2013,35(5):591-606.
[35]JEONG H.The role of the arts and bohemia in sustainable transportation and commuting choices in Chicago,Paris,and Seoul[J].Journal of urban affairs,2019,41(6):1-26.
[36]VANDERLEEUW J M,SIDES J C.Quality of life amenities as contributors to local economies:views of city managers[J].Journal of urban affairs,2016,38(5):661-675.
[37] AUBRY A,BLEIN A,VIVANT E.The promotion of creative industries as a tool for urban planning:the case of the Territoire de La Culture et de La Creation in Paris Region[J].International journal of cultural policy,2015,21(2):121-138.
[38]WU C,WILKES R,SILVER D,et al.Current debates in urban theory from a scale perspective:introducing a scenes approach[J].Urban studies,2018,56(8):1487-1497.
[39]CLARK T N.Can Tocqueville karaoke? global contrasts of citizen participation,the arts and development[M].Bingley,UK:Emerald,2014.
[40]王宁.城市的舒适物配置与空间正义[J].旅游学刊,2017,32(4):2-4.
(1)国内学界对amenities有两种常见译法--“舒适性”与“舒适物”，两者的区别在于：舒适性侧重一个地点的整体或统筹性考虑，或者自上而下的生活质量的评价体系；舒适物侧重微观层面不同种类的设施[1]。本文关注微观层面不同的人、设施、活动和氛围的集合与城市发展的关联，因此采纳“舒适物”的译法，同时认可“舒适性”与“舒适物”两种译法之间的关联性和通用性。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2021.695
中图分类号:TU984
引用信息:
[1]吴军,王桐,郑昊.以舒适物为导向的城市发展模型——一种国际城市研究新范式[J].国际城市规划,2024,39(03):75-81.DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2021.695.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目（21BSH059）
2024-06-19
2024-06-19