| 1,505 | 20 | 182 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
全球化进入新阶段,人才流动性增强,社会空间极化加剧,全球城市面临相似的住房危机:住房需求增加,房价租金上涨,收入极化加剧,包括中等收入者在内的居民住房负担加重。为了提升城市竞争力和维护社会稳定,许多全球城市重新将"可负担住房"作为住房政策的核心,对迈向全球城市的上海具有借鉴意义。本文基于全球城市理论,关注全球城市如何调整可负担住房政策来应对住房和发展问题;梳理伦敦、纽约和新加坡的可负担住房政策,通过比较分析政策类型和政策得失,总结全球城市可负担住房政策相似的发展趋势和不同的制度条件,以此来评价现阶段上海市保障性住房政策,并根据上海市的制度条件提出针对性建议。
Abstract：In the current stage of globalization, city competition could be regarded as the competition of talents, as globalization has been powered by knowledge and talent flows. Meanwhile, sociospatial polarization has been even more obvious in global cities. Most global cities are confronted with similar housing crisis: the flood of immigrants has led to the sharp increase of housing demand, along with housing price and rent; on the other hand, housing becomes unaffordable for more people in the context of income polarization. Thus, affordable housing policies have resurged in many global cities in order to boost city competition and maintain social stability,which can be referenced by Shanghai. In the lens of the global city theory, the paper reviews the affordable housing policies in London, New York and Singapore in recent decades. The comparative study of policy contents and outcomes leads to the discussion on the policy convergence and contextual distinctiveness. In the end, this paper analyses the problems and institutional contexts of the affordable housing policies in Shanghai to makes targeted suggestion for further housing policy.
[1]GaWC.The world according to GaWC 2000[EB/OL].(2009-02-20)[201609-20].http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2000t.html.
[2]GaWC.The world according to GaWC 2016[EB/OL].(2017-04-24)[201801-22].http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2016t.html.
[3]FLORIDA R.Cities and the creative class[J].City&Community,2003,2(1):3-19.
[4]WOOD P,LANDRY C.The intercultural city:planning for diversity advantage[M].London:Earthscan,2008.
[5]SAXENIAN A L.The new argonauts:regional advantage in a global economy[J].Economic Geography,2006,84(1):105-108.
[6]MAROM N,CARMON N.Affordable housing plans in London and New York:between marketplace and social mix[J].Housing Studies,2015,30(7):1-23.
[7]SASSEN S.Global city:New York,London,Tokyo[M].2nd ed.NJ:Princeton University Press,2001.
[8]TOBIN J.Inflation and unemployment[J].American Economic Review,1972,62(1):1-18.
[9]BOSANQUET N,DOERINGER P B.Is there a dual labour market in Great Britain?[J].Economic Journal,1973,83(330):421-435.
[10]HAMNETT C.Social polarisation in global cities:theory and evidence[J].Urban Studies,1994,31(3):401-424.
[11]HILL R C,KIM J W.Global cities and developmental states:New York,Tokyo and Seoul[J].Urban Studies,2000,37(12):2167-2195.
[12]HAMNETT C.Social polarisation,economic restructuring and welfare state regimes[J].Urban Studies,1996,33(8):1407-1430.
[13]LAZAROVIC R,PATON D,BORNSTEIN L.Approaches to workforce housing in London and Chicago:from targeted sectors to income-based eligibility[J].Housing Studies,2016,31(6):651-671.
[14]MORRISON N.Securing key worker housing through the planning system[M]//MONK S,WHITEHEAD C M E.Making housing more affordable:the role of intermediate tenures.Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell,2010:120-134.
[15]王桂新,魏星.上海老龄化高峰期预测及对策研究[J].科学发展,2009(10):38-57.
[16]王雷.上海市保障性住房建设:政策、过程与问题[D].复旦大学,2011.
[17]谢金龙.上海各区人口与房价关系[J].上海房地,2015(12):20-21.
[18]李甜.纽约可负担住宅建设发展及2014~2024住房新政解读[J].住宅科技,2015(3):39-44.
[19]BOWIE D.Politics,planning and homes in a world city[J].Housing Studies,2010,26(3):475-476.
[20]Greater London Authority.The London Plan:Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London[EB/OL].[2016-08-20].https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/the_london_plan_2004.pdf.
[21]Communities and Local Government.Planning policy guidance3:housing[EB/OL].(2000-03-07)[2016-09-10].http://regulations.complete picture.co.uk/pdf/Planning/Planning%20Policy%20Guidance%203-%20Housing.pdf.
[22]莫智,邓小鹏,李启明.我国保障性住房与英美可负担住房的比较[J].中国房地产,2010(4):61-63.
[23]Greater London Authority.Homes for London:the London housing strategy[EB/OL].(2014)[2016-08-30].https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/draft_london_housing_strategy_april_2014_0.pdf.
[24]颜莉.英国住房政策阶段性演进评析:对上海住房发展的启示[J].国际城市规划,2016,31(6).
[25]Department for Communities and Local Government.Evaluation of the mixed communities initiative demonstration projects[EB/OL].(2010)[2018-01-17].https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6360/1775216.pdf.
[26]Great London Authority.Housing in London 2015[EB/OL].[2018-01-15].https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/draft_london_housing_strategy_april_2014_0.pdf.
[27]The Center of Urban Pedagogy.What is affordable housing?NYCe d i t i o n[E B/O L].[2018-01-16].h t t p://w e l c o m e t o c u p.o r g/f i l e_columns/0000/0011/cup-fullbook.pdf.
[28]SCANLON K.International experience[M]//MONK S,WHITEHEADC M E.Making housing more affordable:the role of intermediate tenures.Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell,2010:37-56.
[29]The Center for Popular Democracy.The crisis of fair,affordable housing on Long Island:an analysis of the Long Island workforce housing act[EB/OL].(2015)[2016-08-20].http://www.licf.org/Portals/0/Uploads/Documents/Long%20Island%20Workforce%20Housing%20Act%20Repor t%202015%2005112015.pdf.
[30]New York State Homes and Community Renewal.Middle income housing program[EB/OL].(2016-05-16)[2016-08-30].http://www.nyshcr.org/Funding/OpenWindow/2016/Middle_Income_Housing_Program.pdf.
[31]New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development.The new housing marketplace:creating housing for the next generation 20042013[EB/OL].(2002)[2016-09-15].https://www.abpr.com/archivos/NYCVivienda-Asequible.pdf.
[32]KHARE A T.Putting people back into place-based public policies[J].Journal of Urban Affairs,2015,37(1):47-52.
[33]李俊夫,李玮,李志刚,等.新加坡保障性住房政策研究及借鉴[J].国际城市规划,2012,27(4):36-42.
[34]CHUA B H.Navigating between limits:the future of public housing in Singapore[J].Housing Studies,2014,29(4):520-533.
[35]Ministr y of Manpower.Foreign workforce has a part in productivity drive[EB/OL].(2011-11-04)[2016-09-10].http://www.mom.gov.sg/newsroom/press-replies/2011/foreign-workforce-has-a-part-in-productivity drive.
[36]RENGASAMY G.Guidelines on acceptable:accommodation for foreign workers[EB/OL].(2013-01-17)[2016-09-15].https://www.scdf.gov.sg/content/dam/scdf_inter/download/FSM2012/Guidelines_on%20Acceptable%20Accomodation%20%28Fire%20Safety%20Seminar%29%20%2817%20Jan%202013%29.pdf.
[37]黄砂,王思齐.新加坡公共住房市场发展及综合治理策略研究[C]//中国城市规划学会.城乡治理与规划改革--2014年中国城市规划年会论文集(12-居住区规划).中国城市规划学会,2014:12.
[38]李卓璇,朱雪梅.新加坡规划系统对保障公共住房供应的启示[J].建筑与环境,2012(2):116-118.
[39]张祚,朱介鸣,李江风.新加坡大规模公共住房在城市中的空间组织和分布[J].城市规划学刊,2010(1):97-109.
[40]GURRAN N,MILLIGAN V,BAKER D C,et al.New directions in planning for affordable housing:Australian and international evidence and implications[J].Research and Policy Bulletin,2008,105(Final Report:No.120):1-143.
[41]POWELL J.Why every city needs workforce housing[EB/OL].(2016-0410)[2016-09-30].http://nreionline.com/multifamily/why-every-city-needs workforce-housing.
[42]Great London Authority.First Steps on the Ladder?An Appraisal of Shared Ownership in London[EB/OL].(2015)[2016-08-30].https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/gla_migrate_files_destination/First%20Steps%20On%20The%20Ladder_0.pdf.
[43]戴晓波.“十三五”期间上海住房发展的背景[J].上海房地,2015(11):4-7.
[44]上海市人民政府.上海市国民经济和社会发展第十三个五年规划纲要[EB/OL].(2016)[2018-01-17].http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2315/nw38603/u21aw1101129.html.
[45]上海市人力资源和社会保障局.上海市“十二五”高技能人才发展(专项)规划[EB/OL].(2011)[2016-08-30].http://www.12333sh.gov.cn/200912333/2009xwzx/rdzt/zcjd4/04/201110/t20111017_1134336.shtml.
[46]CHEN J,YANG Z,WANG Y P.The new Chinese model of public housing:a step forward or backward?[J].Housing Studies,2014,29(4):534-550.
[47]人才置业攻略:上海七区县优秀人才购房优惠政策大全[EB/OL].(2012)[2016-09-10].http://news.sh.fang.com/zt/201208/rencaizufangyouhuish.html.
[48]上海市人民政府.关于本市廉租住房和公共租赁住房统筹建设、并轨运行、分类使用的实施意见[EB/OL].(2013-08-30)[2016-08-20].http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw2404/nw31526/nw31527/u26aw36852.html.
(1)affordable housing,也被译为“可支付住房”。在2008年的“伦敦规划”(London Plan)中被定义为“为了收入不足以获得本区域内体面和适合住房的居民所建设的住房”。在美国,当一个家庭将低于30%的收入花费在住房上,可认为他们的住房“可负担”[18]。
(2)在英国,“关键工作者”(key workers)主要包括在公共服务部门和影响地方经济发展的重要部门的工作者。地方政府可以根据各地情况规定其“关键工作者”。
(1)英国的混居社区主要指住房产权的混合。
(1)美国的混合社区主要指不同收入居民的混合。
(1)廉租房主要针对具有城镇户籍的最低收入家庭和低收入住房困难家庭,公共租赁房主要针对中等偏下收入住房困难家庭、新就业无房职工和在城镇稳定就业的外来务工人员。
基本信息:
中图分类号:F299.23
引用信息:
[1]贾宜如,张泽,苗丝雨,等.全球城市的可负担住房政策分析及对上海的启示[J].国际城市规划,2019,34(02):70-77.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(41501170、41422103);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金
2019-04-22
2019-04-22
2019-04-22