| 754 | 14 | 64 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文回顾了社会科学中新制度主义理论的发展和沿革及其与沟通规划理论的关系,并强调了它与有关实践任务的关联,这种实践任务回应了公共政策演变中对更多地方意识的需求。作者追溯了对于公民社会的多种诉求和社会生活能够做出更多回应的管治形式的演变,并且讨论了社会建构主义关于制度的概念、参与者和网络的重要性、结构和能动作用的内在联系,以及社会网络的文化维度。作者还探究了管治能力或制度能力发展的意义。在回顾沟通规划理论时,作者论述了哈贝马斯对于交往行为的研究方法可能被引入制度主义理论的观点中或者被改写。最后,作者探讨了这些进展如何能够增进理解并形成相应的战略,用更加包容的方法推动关注地方的、整合性的公共政策发展。
Abstract：This article reviews the developments in the new institutionalism in social science and their relation to communicative planning theory,with emphasis on the relevance to the practical task of responding to demands for a more place-conscious evolution in public policy. I trace the evolution of forms of governance that are more responsive to the multiple claims and social worlds of civil society and include discussion of the social-constructionist conception of institutions,the significance of actors and networks,the interrelation between structure and agency,and the cultural dimensions of social networks. The implications for developing governance capability or institutional capacity are also explored. In reviewing comnmunicative planning theory,I discuss how Habermas’s approach to communicative action may be reworked or positioned in an institutionalist perspective. Finally,I explore how these developments can be used to develop understanding and strategies for evolving more inclusionary approaches to integrated,place-focused public policy.
Abers R.Learning Democratic Practice:distributing government resources throughpopular participation in Porto Alegre,Brazil./Douglass M and Friedmann J.Citiesfor Citizens.London,U.K:John Wiley,1998:39-66.
Amin A.and Thrift N,eds.Globalisation,Institutions and Regional Development.Oxford,U.K:Oxford University Press,1994.
Amin A.and Hausner J,eds.Beyond Market and Hierarchy:interactive governanceand social complexity.Cheltenham,U.K:Edward Elgar,1997.
Asheim B.Industrial Districts as‘Learning Regions’:a condition for prosperity-European Planning Studies,1996,4(3):379-400.
Bauman Z.Postmodernity and its Discontents.Cambridge,U.K:Polity Press,1997.
Belussi F.Local Systems,Industrial Districts and Institutional Networks:towards anew evolutionary paradigm of industrial economics-European Planning Studies,1996,4(3):5-26.
Bishop J.Re-inventing Planning3:collaboration and consensus.Town PlanningReview,1998,67(3):111-113.
Bourdieu P.Outline of a Theory of Practice.Cambridge,U.K:Cambridge UniversityPress,1977.
Bourdieu P.In Other Words:essays towards a reflexive sociology.Oxford,U.K:Polity Press,1990.
Castells M.The Rise of the Network Society.Oxford,U.K:Blackwell,1996.
Castells M.The Power of Identity.Oxford,U.K:Blackwell,1997.
Coleman J.Social Capital and the Creation of Human Capital.American Journal ofSociology,1988,94:S95-S120.
Committee for Spatial Development of the European Union(CDS).EuropeanSpatial Development Perspective:Ist Official Draft:Noordwijk,Netherlands.CEC DGXVI.Brussels,Belgium,1997.
Dear M.Prolegomena to a Post-modern Urbanism./Healey P,Cameron S J,DavoudiS,Graham S and Madanipour A.Managing Cities London.U.K:John Wiley,1995:27-44.
Department of the Environment,Transport and the Regions(DETR).The Future ofRegional Planning Guidance:Consultation Paper.London,U.K,1998.
Douglas M.Risk and Blame:Essays in Cultural Theory London,U.K:Routledge,1992.
Douglass M and Friedmann J,eds.Citiesfor Citizens.London,U.K:John Wiley,1998.
Dryzek J S.Discursive Democracy:Politics,Policy and Political Science.Cambridge,U.K:Cambridge University Press,1990.
Dyrberg T B.The Circular Structure of Power:Politics,Identity,Community.London,U.K:Verso,1997.
Fainstein S.and Hirst C.Urban Social Movements./Judge D,Stoker G and WolmanH,eds.Theories of urban politics.London,U.K:Sage,1995:181-204.
Faludi A.Framing with Images.Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design,1996,23:93-108.
Flyvberg B.Rationality and Power.Chicago,Ill:Chicago University Press,1998.
Forester J.Planning in the Face of Power.Berkeley,Calif:University of CaliforniaPress,1989.
Friedmann J.Planning in the Public Domain.Princeton,N.J:Princeton UniversityPress,1987.
Friedmann J.Empowerment:the politics of alternative development.Oxford,U.K:Blackwell,1992.
Friedmann J.Towards a non-Euclidean Mode of Planning.Journal of the AmericanPlanning Association,1993,59(3):482-484.
Fukuyama F.Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity.New York:Free Press,1995.
Geertz C.Local Knowledge:further essays in interpretive anthropology.New York:Basic Books,1983.
Giddens A.The Constitution of Society.Cambridge,U.K.:Polity Press,1984.
Gilroy R.Building the Vision of a City for Everyone:planning in the context ofmulticulturalism in Vancouver.Department of Town and Country PlanningWorking Paper No.54.Newcastle,U.K:University of Newcastle,1996.
Graham S.and Healey P.Relational Concepts of Space and Place:issues in planningtheory and practice.European Planning Studies,1999,7(5):623-646.
Grove White R.Land,The Law and Environment.Journal of Law and Society,1991,18(1):32-47.
Habermas J.The Theory of Communicative Action:Vol1:reason and therationalisation of society.Cambridge,U.K.:Polity Press,1984.
Habermas J.Justification and Application:remarks on discourse ethics.Cambridge,U.K:Polity Press,1993.
Hajer M.The Politics of Environmental Discourse.Oxford,U.K:Oxford UniversityPress,1995.
Harding A.Urban Regimes in European Cities.European Urban and RegionalStudies,1997,4(4):291-314.
Harvey D.Justice,Nature and the Politics of Difference.Oxford,U.K:Blackwell,1996.
Healey P.Collaborative Planning:shaping places in fragmented societies.London,U.K:Macmillan,1997.
Healey P.Collaborative Planning in a Stakeholder Society.Town Planning Review,1998a,69(1):1-21.
Healey P.Building Institutional Capacity through Collaborative Approaches toUrban Planning.Environment and Planning A,1998b,30:1531-1546.
Healey P.and Barrett S.Structure and Agency in Land and Property DevelopmentProcesses.Urban Studies,1990,27(1):89-104.
Healey P.,Cameron S,Davoudi S,Graham S and Madanipour A,eds.Managing theCity:the new urban context.London,U.K.:John Wiley,1995.
Healey P.,Khakee A.Motte A and Needham B.Making Strategic Spatial Plans:innovation in Europe.London,U.K:UCL Press,1997.
Healey P.,Hoch C.,Lauria M.and Feldman M.Planning Theory,Political Economy andthe Interpretive Turn:the debate continues!Planning Theory,1997,17:10-85.
Horkheimer M.and Adorno T.The Dialectics of Enlightenment.New York:Herderand Herder,1972.
Hwang S.W.The Implications of the Nonlinear Paradigm for Integrated EnvironmentalDesign and Management.Journal of Planning Literature,1996,11:167-178.
Innes J.Planning Theory’s Emerging Paradigm:communicative action and interactivepractice.Journal of Planning Education and Research,1995,14(3):183-190.
Innes J.,Gruber J.,Thompson R.and Neuman M.Coordinating Growth andEnvironmental Management Through Consensus-building:Report to theCalifornia Policy Seminar.Berkeley,Calif:University of California,1994.
Innes J.and Booher D.Power and Planning in the Information Age:consensus-building as action strategy for the network society.Paper presented to theCongress of the Association of European Schools of Planning,Aveiro,July,1998.
Innes J.and Booher D.Consensus-building as Role Playing and Bricolage:towarda theory of collaborative planning.Journal on the American Planning Association,1999,67(1):9-26.
Krumholz N.and Forester J.Making Equity Planning Work.Philadelphia,Pa.:Temple University Press,1990.
Latour B.Science in Action.Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press,1987.
Lauria M.and Whelan R.Planning Theory and Political Economy:the need forreintegration.Planning Theory,1995,14:8-33.
Lowe P.,Clark J.,Seymour S.and Ward N.Moralising the Countryside.London,U.K:UCL Press,1998.
Iulkes S.Power:a radical view.London,U.K.:Macmillan,1974.
Mawson J.The English Regional Debate:towards regional governance or government./Bradbury J.and Mawson J.,eds.British Regionalism and Devolution:thechallenges of state reform and European integration.London,U.K:JessicaKingsley,1997:180-211.
Neuman M.Images as Institution Builders:metropolitan planning in Madrid.European Planning Studies,1996,4(3):293-312.
North D.Institutions,Institutional Change and Economic Performance.Cambridge,U.K:Cambridge University Press,1990.
Owens S.Giants in the Path:planning,sustainability and environmental values.Town Planning Review,1997,68(3):293-304.
Painter J.Regulation,Regime and Practice in Urban Politics./Lauria M.ReconstructingUrban Regime Theory.Thousand Oaks,Calif:Sage,1997:122-143.
Perry D.Making Space:planning as a mode of thought./Liggett H.and Perry D.,eds.Spatial Practices.Thousand Oaks,Calif:Sage,1995:209-242.
Powell W.W.and Dimaggio P.J.,eds.The New Institutionalism in OrganisationalAnalysis.Chicago,Ill.:University of Chicago Press,1991.
Putnam R.Making Democracy Work:civic traditions in modern Italy.Princeton,N.J:University of Princeton Press,1993.
Rabinow P.The Foucault Reader.London,U.K:Penguin,1984.
Rhodes R.The Institutional Approach./Marsh D.and Stoker G.Theory and Methodsin Political Science.London,U.K:Macmillan,1995:42-57.
Sager T.Communicative Planning Theory.Aldershot,U.K:Hants,Avebury,1994.
Sandercock L.Cosmopolis.London,U.K:John Wiley,1998.
Schneecloth L.and Shibley S.R.Place-Making:the art and practice of buildingcommunities.New York:John Wiley,1995.
Schon D.and Rein M.Frame Reflection:towards the resolution of intractable policycontroversies.New York:Basic Books,1994.
Seidman S.Contested Knowledge:social theory in the post-modern era.2nd edition.Oxford,U.K.:Blackwell,1998.
Selman P.Local Agenda21:substance or spin-Journal of Environmental Management and Planning,1998,41(5):533-554.
Shotter J.Conversational Realities:constructing life through language.London,U.K:Sage,1993.
Storper M.Regional Economies as Relational Assets./Lee R.and Wills R.,eds.Geographies of Economies.London,U.K:Arnold,1994:248-258.
Tarrow S.Power in Movement:social movements,collective action and politics.Cambridge,U.K:Cambridge University Press,1994.
Tewdwr-Jones M.and Allmendinger P.Deconstructing Communicative Rationality:a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning.Environment and PlanningA,1998,30:1979-1989.
Throgmorton J.Planning as Persuasive Story-Telling.Chicago,Ill:University ofChicago Press,1996.
Vigar G.,Healey P.,Hull A.and Davoudi S.Planning,Governance and SpatialStrategy in Britain:an institutionalist approach.London,U.K:Macmillan,2000.
Williams R.The Country and the City.Harmondsworth,U.K:Penguin,1975.
Wilson P.Building Social Capital:a learning agenda for the twenty first century.Urban Studies,1997,34:745-760.
Yiftachel O.The Dark Side of Modernism:planning as control of an ethnic minority./Watson S.and Gibson K.,eds.Postmodern Cities and Spaces.Oxford,U.K:Blackwell,1994:216-242.
Young I.M.Justice and the Politics of Difference.Princeton,N.J:PrincetonUniversity Press,1990.
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU981
引用信息:
[1]帕齐·希利,邢晓春.制度主义理论分析、沟通规划与场所塑造[J].国际城市规划,2008,No.103(03):25-34.
2008-06-19
2008-06-19