| 667 | 0 | 260 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
互联网技术被应用于公众参与，其在城乡空间治理体系中的重要性日益突出。笔者在综述国内外研究动态的基础上，针对政府网页、社交媒体和判例文书素材开展实证分析，选取案件探讨互联网信息环境下城乡空间治理中的参与模式，揭示网络社会在规划行政沟通、司法案件审判、辅助决策裁量等环节的作用机制。研究发现：一方面，网络广泛应用于各类城乡治理实践，尤其在类案检索、证据开示等方面可显著提高城乡规划的效率和精准度，加速城乡治理决策体系的模式转变；另一方面，互联网工具的深度应用有利于收敛裁量的自由度。笔者建议在主体建设、相对人确定、类案裁判、多主体决策控制方面优化城乡治理体系，拓展规划领域的基层组织效能与业务范畴，推进城乡空间问题的诉源治理，辨析网络参与的在地性并展望城乡空间治理的新范型。
Abstract：Internet technology is applied to public participation, and its importance in urban and rural spatial governance system is becoming increasingly prominent. Based on a review of domestic and international research developments, this paper conducts an empirical analysis of government websites, social media and case law materials; the participation mode of internet environment in urban and rural spatial governance has been discussed, and the role mechanism of network society in planning administrative communication, judicial case adjudication, and auxiliary decision-making discretion is revealed. This paper finds that on the one hand, the network has been widely used in various urban and rural governance practices, especially in the retrieval of similar cases and evidence discovery, which can significantly improve the efficiency and accuracy of urban and rural planning, and accelerate the mode transformation of urban and rural spatial governance decision-making system. On the other hand, the in-depth application of internet tools is conducive to restricting the degree of discretion, and it is recommended to optimize urban and rural governance in terms of cultivating adjudications, determining the counterparts, referencing similar cases and multi-entity decision-making control. We suggest the integration of network society into our exploration and planning sector, aiming to fortify its public trust mechanisms. This will lead to an expansion in grassroots organization efficacy and service offerings, which goal is to implement a system for resolving urban and rural spatial issues at their origin. It is also necessary to analyze the network participation model based on the locality and sublimate it into a new paradigm of urban and rural spatial governance.
[1]CASTELLS M. The rise of the network society[M]. Oxford:Wiley Blackwell,1996.
[2]高中岗,张兵.对我国城市规划发展的若干思考和建议[J].城市发展研究, 2010, 17(2):16-22.
[3]GEERTMAN S, STILLWELL J. Planning support science:developments and challenges[J]. Environment and planning b:urban analytics and city science, 2020, 47(8):1326-1342.
[4]周恺,闫岩,宋斌.基于互联网的规划信息交流平台和公众参与平台建设[J].国际城市规划, 2012, 27(2):103-107, 119.
[5]刘垚,田银生,周可斌.从一元决策到多元参与：广州恩宁路旧城更新案例研究[J].城市规划, 2015, 39(8):101-111.
[6]GORDON E, MANOSEVITCH E. Augmented deliberation:merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning[J].New media&society, 2010, 13(1):75-95.
[7]CASTELLS M. Globalisation, networking, urbanisation:reflections on the spatial dynamics of the information age[J]. Urban studies, 2010, 47(13):2737-2745.
[8]ALBRECHTS S, MANDELBAUM S. The network society:a new context for planning?[M]. London:Routledge, 2005.
[9]彭伊侬,周素红.行动者网络视角下的住宅型多代屋社区治理机制分析：以德国科隆市利多多代屋为例[J].国际城市规划, 2018, 33(2):75-81.
[10]文军,高艺多.技术变革与我国城市治理逻辑的转变及其反思[J].江苏行政学院学报, 2017(6):47-56.
[11]陈江.从行政治理到司法治理：中国社会治理模式的新选择[J].人民法治, 2017(7):7-9.
[12]郑家昊.政府引导社会管理：复杂性条件下的社会治理[J].中国人民大学学报, 2014, 28(2):14-21.
[13]黄文俊,王富博,刘永存,等.新时代人民法院“执源治理”问题研究[J].中国应用法学, 2023(6):88-95.
[14]VONK G, GEERTMAN S, SCHOT P. Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support system[J]. Environment and planning a:economy and space, 2005, 37:909-924.
[15]ALLEN B , TAMINDAEL L , BICHERTON S , et al. Doescitizen coproduction lead to better urban services in smart cities projects? an empirical study on e-participation in a mobile big data platform[J].Government information quarterly, 2020, 37(1):101412.
[16]VONK G, GEERTMAN S, SCHOT P. Usage of planning suppor t systems[M]//VAN LEEUWEN J, TIMMERMANS H, eds. Innovations in design and decision support systems in architecture and urban planning.Berlin:Springer, 2006:263-274.
[17]ZHANG L, HOOIMEIJER P, LIN Y, et al. Strategies of the built-heritage stewardship movement in urban redevelopment in the internet age:the case of the Bell-Drum Towers controversy in Beijing, China[J]. Geoforum, 2019,106:97-104.
[18]DENG Z, LIN Y, ZHAO M, et al. Collaborative planning in the new media age:The Dafo Temple controversy, China[J]. Cities, 2015, 45:41-50.
[19]ARNSTEIN S R. A ladder of citizen participation[J]. Journal of the American institute of planners, 1969, 35(4):216-224.
[20]MACCANI G, CONNOLLY N, MCLOUGHLIN S, et al. An emerging typology of IT governance structural mechanisms in smart cities[J].Government information quarterly, 2020, 37(4):101499.
[21]DEVLIN C, COAFFEE J. Planning and technological innovation:the governance challenges faced by English local authorities in adopting planning technologies[J]. International journal of urban sciences, 2023,27(1):149-163.
[22]陈璐,周剑云,庞晓媚.洛杉矶城市分区的演变与新综合分区的转型[J].国际城市规划, 2022, 37(4):63-73.
[23]李理,卢健松.中国当代集合住宅参与型共建的多元探索与案例实践[J].建筑学报, 2021(增刊1):175-182.
[24]邵健.司法参与社会治理之研究[D].长春:吉林大学, 2014.
[25]HEALEY P. Collaborative planning in perspective[J]. Planning theory, 2003,2(2):101-123.
[26]HEALEY P. Collaborative planning:shaping places in fragmented societies[M]. London:Macmillan, 1997.
[27]刘桂锋,钱锦琳,卢章平.国内外数据治理研究进展：内涵、要素、模型与框架[J].图书情报工作, 2017, 61(21):137-144.
[28]VAN DER VOORT H G, KLIEVINK A J, ARNABOLDI M, et al.Rationality and politics of algorithms. will the promise of big data survive the dynamics of public decision making?[J]. Government information quarterly, 2019, 36(1):27-38.
[29]HABERMAS J. The theory of communicative action[M]. Boston:Beacon Press, 1991.
[30]杨璐,李丽.浅谈大数据在资产评估中的应用[J].中国资产评估,2015(6):41-44.
[31]全国生态环境十年变化调查评估报告发布[J].城市规划, 2016(7):6.
[32]INNES J E, BOOHER D E. Planning with complexity:an introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy[M]. London:Routledge, 2010.
[33]BOOHER D, INNES J. Network power in collaborative planning[J]. Journal of planning education and research, 2002, 21(3):221-236.
[34]ZHAO M, LIN Y, DERUDDER B. Demonstration of public participation and communication through social media in the network society within Shanghai[J]. Environment and planning b, 2017, 45(3):529-547.
[35]NOVELLI C, TADDEO M, FLORIDI L. Accountability in artificial intelligence:what it is and how it works[J]. AI&society, 2023(2):1-12.
[36]张翰林.人工智能审判何以成为可能？人机协同司法审判模式初探[J].上海法学研究, 2022, 16:61-72.
[37]屠李,赵鹏军,张超荣,等.面向新一代人工智能的城市规划决策系统优化[J].城市发展研究, 2019, 26(1):54-59.
[38]谢盼,林文棋,孙小明,等.基于大数据的空间治理智慧决策系统建设理论与实践[J].规划师, 2020, 36(22):46-51.
[39]吴志强,甘惟,刘朝晖,等. AI城市：理论与模型架构[J].城市规划学刊,2022(5):17-23.
(1)广西壮族自治区贵港市中级人民法院，案号（2020）桂08行终146号，黄某、黎某资源行政管理：其他二审行政裁定书。
(2)河南省新乡市中级人民法院，案号（2020）豫07行初111号，李某、孟某等与新乡市卫滨区人民政府等一审行政判决书。
(3)山东省烟台市中级人民法院，案号（2019）鲁06民终3580号，张某、龙口东海房地产公司侵权责任纠纷二审民事判决书。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2023.434
中图分类号:TP393.09;D035
引用信息:
[1]钟家晖,赵渺希,危兆宾,等.网络社会城乡空间治理的参与模式与展望[J].国际城市规划,2026,41(01):23-31.DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2023.434.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金“网络社会参与下岭南城镇意象的衍化机理研究”（52178037）
2024-05-22
2024-05-22
2024-05-22