| 451 | 0 | 24 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
随着人类大脑活动机制研究的深入，脑科学这项前沿研究的内容方法可以为建筑城市学科的创新探索提供参考。大脑如何形成空间感知的机制是建筑城市学科的一项基础问题，同时基于脑空间感知的情绪与健康、脑机交互等问题也亟待探索。针对上述问题与趋势，脑科学与建筑城市交叉融合可形成城市与建筑空间脑科学研究领域，该领域通过建立“空间－脑－机”研究系统，探索空间认知基础机制发现支撑下的设计理论、技术与应用场景。
Abstract：With the deepening of research on the mechanism of human brain activity， the content and methods of neuroscience， a cutting-edge research field， can provide reference for innovative exploration in the field of architecture and cities. The mechanism of how the brain forms spatial perception is a fundamental issue in the field of architecture and urban studies， and there is also an urgent need to explore health and emotions， brain computer interaction， and other issues based on brain spatial perception. In response to the above issues and trends， the cross integration of brain science and architectural urban fields can form the research field of urban and architectural spatial brain science. This field establishes a "space brain machine" research system to explore the design basic theories， technologies， and application scenarios supported by the discovery of space cognitive mechanisms of brain.
[1] 范明生. 西方美学通史第1卷古希腊罗马美学[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社， 1999: 11-58.
[2] 恩斯特·克里斯. 艺术的心理分析探索[M]. 牟春， 译. 北京: 商务印书馆， 2024.
[3] 贡布里希. 秩序感——装饰艺术的心理学研究[M]. 杨思梁， 徐一维， 译. 杭州: 浙江摄影出版社， 1987.
[4] 鲁道夫·阿恩海姆. 艺术与视知觉[M]. 滕守尧， 朱疆源， 译. 成都:四川人民出版社， 1998.
[5] STEG L， VAN DEN BERG A， DE GROOT J. Environmental psychology: an introduction[M]. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell， 2012: 3-4.
[6] 王金亭， 马宏， 王玉江. 生命科学导论[M]. 武汉: 华中科技大学出版社， 2014: 366.
[7] 商卫星. 意识新论—以认知科学为背景[M]. 武汉: 武汉出版社， 2015: 3.
[8] 艾莉森·考德威尔， 迈卡·考德威尔. 大脑的奥秘：人人要懂的脑科学[M]. 唐洁， 译. 北京: 华龄出版社， 2022: 3.
[9] 王志良. 脑与认知科学概论[M]. 北京: 北京邮电大学出版社， 2021: 11.
[10] 蒲慕明， 徐波， 谭铁牛. 脑科学与类脑研究概述[J]. 中国科学院院刊， 2016， 31(7):725-736.
[11] KLEM G H， LüDERS H， JASPER H H， et al. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology[J]. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology， 1999， 52(Supplement): 3-6.
[12] CHATRIAN G E， LETTICH E， NELSON P L. Modified nomenclature for the '10%' electrode system[J]. J Clin Neurophysiol， 1988， 5: 183-186.
[13] OOSTENVELD R， PRAAMSTRA P. The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements[J]. Clinical neurophysiology， 2001， 112: 713-719.
[14] LEE S， SHIN W， PARK E J. Implications of neuroarchitecture for the experience of the built environment: a scoping review[J]. Archnet-IJAR， 2022， 16(2): 225-244.
[15] HIGUERA-TRUJILLO J L， LLINARES C， MACAGNO E. The cognitive-emotional design and study of architectural space: A scoping review of neuroarchitecture and its precursor approaches[J]. Sensors， 2021， 21: 2193.
[16] VALENTINE C， MITCHELTREE H. Architecture and bioethics: investigating the ethical implications of recent advances in the field of neuroarchitecture[J]. Intelligent buildings international， 2024， 16(1): 3-9.
[17] ASSEM H M， KHODEIR L M， FATHY F. Designing for human wellbeing: The integration of neuroarchitecture in design–a systematic review[J]. Ain Shams engineering journal， 2023， 14(6): 102102.
[18] GHAMARI H， GOLSHANY N， NAGHIBI RAD P， et al. Neuroarchitecture assessment: an overview and bibliometric analysis[J]. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ， 2021， 11: 1362-1387.
[19] ADLI M， BERGER M， BRAKEMEIER E， et al. Neurourbanism: towards a new discipline[J]. The lancet psychiatry， 2017， 4(3): 183-185.
[20] NDAGUBA E， CILLIERS J， MBANGA S， et al. Re-imaging the future in urban studies and built environment discourse: a neurourbanism perspective[J]. Buildings， 2022， 12: 2056.
[21] PYKETT J， OSBORNE T， RESCH B. From urban stress to neurourbanism: how should we research city well-being?[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers， 2020， 110(6): 1936-1951.
[22] BUTTAZZONI A， et al. How do urban environments affect young people’s mental health? a novel conceptual framework to bridge public health， planning， and neurourbanism[J]. Public health reports (1974-)， 2022， 137(1): 48-61.
[23] SHEMESH A， LEISMAN G， BAR M， et al. A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space[J]. Architectural science review， 2021， 64(4): 394-407.
[24] SPIERS H， BARRY C. Neural systems supporting navigation[J]. Current opinion in behavioral sciences， 2015， 1: 47-55.
[25] MOSTAFAVI A， CRUZ-GARZA J G， KALANTARI S. Enhancing lighting design through the investigation of illuminance and correlated color temperature’s effects on brain activity: an EEG-VR approach[J]. Journal of building engineering， 2023， 75: 106776.
[26] BANAEI M， HATAMI J， YAZDANFAR A， et al. Walking through architectural spaces: the impact of interior forms on human brain dynamics[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience， 2017， 11.
[27] ROUNDS J D， CRUZ-GARZA J G， KALANTARI S. Using posterior EEG theta band to assess the effects of architectural designs on landmark recognition in an urban setting[J]. Frontiers in human neuroscience， 2020， 14: 584385.
[28] COUTROT A， MANLEY E， GOODROE S， et al. Entropy of city street networks linked to future spatial navigation ability[J]. Nature， 2022， 604: 104-110.
[29] LI M， LU B L. Emotion classification based on gamma-band EEG[C] // 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society， Minneapolis， MN， USA， 2009: 1223-1226.
[30] WANG X W， NIE D， LU B L. Emotional state classification from EEG data using machine learning approach[J]. Neurocomputing， 2014， 129: 94-106.
[31] LI W， HUAN W， HOU B W， et al. Can emotion be transferred?–a review on transfer learning for EEG-based emotion recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on cognitive and developmental systems， 2021， 14.
[32] SHEMESH A， et al. A neurocognitive study of the emotional impact of geometrical criteria of architectural space[J]. Architectural science review， 2021， 64(4): 394-407.
[33] COBURN A， VARTANIAN O， KENETT Y N， et al. Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors[J]. Cortex， 2020， 126: 217-241.
[34] VALENTINE C. The impact of architectural form on physiological stress: a systematic review[J/OL]. Frontiers in computer science， 2024-01-04[2025-07-15]. DOI: 10.3390/fcomp.2023.1237531.
[35] CHO H R， KIM S， LEE J S. Spaces eliciting negative and positive emotions in shrinking neighbourhoods: a study in Seoul， South Korea， using EEG (Electroencephalography)[J]. J urban health， 2022， 99: 245-259.
[36] AL-BARRAK L， KANJO E， YOUNIS E M G. NeuroPlace: categorizing urban places according to mental states[J]. PLOS One， 2017， 12(9): e0183890.
[37] LIN W， CHEN Q， JIANG M， et al. Sitting or walking? analyzing the neural emotional indicators of urban green space behavior with mobile EEG[J]. J urban health， 2020， 97: 191-203.
[38] XU J， LIU X， LI Q， et al. Global urbanicity is associated with brain and behaviour in young people[J]. Nat hum behav， 2022， 6: 279-293.
[39] BUTTAZZONI A， PARKER A， MINAKER L. Investigating the mental health implications of urban environments with neuroscientific methods and mobile technologies: a systematic literature review[J]. Health & place， 2021， 70: 102597.
[40] YANG Q， CRUZ-GARZA J G， KALANTARI S. MindSculpt: using a brain-computer interface to enable designers to create diverse geometries by thinking[D]. Ithaca， N.Y.: Cornell University， 2023.
[41] YANG Q， FENG S， ZHAO T L， et al. Co-design with myself: a brain-computer interface design tool that predicts live emotion to enhance metacognitive monitoring of designers[C] // 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '23). Association for Computing Machinery， New York， NY， USA， 2023: 1-8.
[42] MACRUZ A， BUENO E， PALMA G， et al. Measuring human perception of biophilically-driven design with facial micro-expressions analysis and EEG biosensor[C] // 2021 DigitalFUTURES. CDRF 2021. Springer， Singapore: 2022: 231-241.
[43] NGUYEN D， MOLETA T， SCHNABEL M A. Mindful manifestation: a method for designing architectural forms using brain activities[DB/OL]. DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.14838075.v2.
[44] CUTELLIC P. Growing shapes with a generalised model from neural correlates of visual discrimination[C] // 2020 DigitalFUTURES. CDRF 2021. Springer， Singapore: 2021.
[45] CAO B， NIU H， HAO J， et al. Spatial visual imagery (SVI)-based electroencephalograph discrimination for natural CAD manipulation[J]. Sensors， 2024， 24(3): 785.
[46] 郑宗军. 普通心理学[M]. 济南: 山东人民出版社， 2014: 49.
[47] 梁宁建. 心理学导论[M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社， 2011: 169.
[48] LIU Y J， GUAN X Y， WANG H， et al. Mindscape: research of high-information density street environments based on electroencephalogram recording and virtual reality head-mounted simulation[C] // 42nd eCAADe Conference， Department of Architecture， University of Cyprus， Nicosia， Cyprus， 2024.
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2024.611
中图分类号:TU984.113
引用信息:
[1]王辉,刘奕江,关翔宇.城市与建筑空间脑科学研究框架——进展、方向与探索[J].国际城市规划().DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2024.611.
2025-07-22
2025-07-22
2025-07-22