| 632 | 10 | 80 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
生态文明背景下,城市的自然保护与生态规划成为城市规划的一项重点工作。然而由于快速城镇化时期土地的稀缺性,城市发展与自然保护之间存在剧烈矛盾,涉及多方利益相关者的不同诉求。因此对于城市生态保护的空间管制不仅是一项技术规划,更是根植于当地制度框架与经济社会文化背景之中的复杂规划决策。本文以香港新界沙螺洞近30年来面临的保育与发展之间的矛盾为案例,在考察香港自然保育政策、规划及法律法规的制度框架基础上,采用"效率性"、"公平性"、"有效性"、"合法性"的综合分析框架对案例中三个规划决策进行分析,关注制度构建下不同参与方的利益冲突与决策制定的复杂性,力求对城市自然保育规划决策困境的成因获得更加全面深入的理解。
Abstract:In the context of ecological civilization, urban natural conservation and ecological planning have become an important part of urban planning. However, due to land scarcity, there exists a severe conflict between urban development and natural conservation, which involves different appeals among different stakeholders. Therefore, spatial regulation for urban ecological conservation is not only a matter of technical planning, but a complex planning decision embedded in the local institutional framework and economic, social, and cultural context. Sha Lo Tung, located in New Territory region of Hong Kong, has been faced with dilemmas of planning making between development and conservation over the past thirty years. Taking it as a case, this study analyzes the three planning decisions regarding its development and conservation through an analytical framework focusing on "efficiency", "equity", "effectiveness" and "legitimacy", based on the natural conservation policy, planning, and rules and laws in Hong Kong. It aims to gain a deep understanding of the dilemmas of urban natural conservation, through the examination of the institutionally constructed interests and conflicts of different stakeholders as well as the complexity of environmental related planning decision-making.
[1]陈志端.新型城镇化背景下的绿色生态城市发展[J].城市发展研究,2015,22(1):1-6.
[2]吴承照,张娜.城市自然保护的内涵、历程与策略研究[J].同济大学学报:社会科学版,2010,21(6):31-38.
[3]包静晖,王祥荣.伦敦的生态及自然保护[J].国外城市规划,2000(3):36-38.
[4]黄观贵.香港自然保育的现况与前瞻[J].地理学报,1997,52:152-160.
[5]赵振斌,包浩生.国外城市自然保护与生态重建及其对我国的启示[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(4):390-396.
[6]邢忠,汤西子,徐晓波.城市边缘区生态环境保护研究综述[J].国际城市规划,2014(5):5.
[7]吴之凌.城市生态功能区规划与实施的国际经验及启示——以大伦敦地区和兰斯塔德地区为例[J].国际城市规划,2015(1):15.
[8]Adger W N,Brown K,Fairbrass J,Jordan A,Paavola J,Rosendo S,Seyfang G.Governance for Sustainability:Towards a‘Thick’Analysis of Environmental Decision Making[J].Environment and planning A,2003,35(6):1095-1110.
[9]香港特别行政区政府渔农自然护理署.香港生物多样性网页[OL].[2015-03].http://www.afcd.gov.hk/tc_chi/conservation/hkbiodiversity/hkbiodiversity.html.
[10]香港特别行政区政府规划署.香港规划标准与准则第十章:自然保育及文物保护.香港,2011.
[11]香港特别行政区政府.新自然保育政策.香港,2004.
[12]香港地方.沙螺洞[OL].[2015-03].http://www.hk-place.com/view.php?id=147.
[13]F r i e n d s o f t h e E a r t h.Po s i t i o n Pa p e r:O b j e c t i o n t o t h e P ro p o s e d Development at Sha Lo Tung[M].Tai Po:Friends of the Earth,1994.
[14]High Court.Sha Lo Tung Development Co.Ltd v.The Chief Executive in Council(2001)HCAL124/2000.Hong Kong,2000.
[15]刘锦辉.沙螺洞——迷失于保育与发展之间的净土[J].大学线月刊,2009(90):47-48.
[16]Sha Lo Tung Development Company Ltd.Pilot Project for PublicPrivate Partnership Conservation Scheme,Sha Lo Tung Valley,Tai Po:Environmental Assessment Report-Executive Summary,2008.
[17]东方日报.十团体反对沙螺洞建龛场[N].(2012-06-14).http://orientaldaily.on.cc/cnt/news/20120614/00176_040.html.
[18]香港商报.沙螺洞村民怒呼发展无期[N].(2015-03-05).http://www.hkcd.com.hk/content/2015-03/05/content_3430714.htm.
(1)香港地球之友成立于1983年,旨在“通过推动政府、企业和公众,共建可持续发展的环保政策、营商方式和生活形态,以保护香港和临近地区的环境为目标”。参见香港地球之友网址http://www.foe.org.hk/c/content/cat_page.asp?cat_id=35#.VTN8r WSUcrg。
基本信息:
中图分类号:TU984.115
引用信息:
[1]李劼,刘建政,李卫锋.城市自然保育规划决策困境——以香港沙螺洞为例[J].国际城市规划,2017,32(05):80-86.
基金信息:
香港大学种子基金研究计划(201511159133)
2017-10-19
2017-10-19