国际城市规划

规划学科的源流众多,具体的编制与研究话语中也运用了诸多领域的修辞,这些修辞具备一定功用,但也有意无意地悬置了空间尺度。空间尺度悬置隐含着还原论认识观,在横向维度上选择性强化了关联事件的某些特征,忽略了无所不在的关联互动;在纵向维度上忽略了空间规律在多重尺度上不可通约和难以遍历。追寻根源,来自物理、生物与建筑等领域的观念和理论预设影响了认知框架,直观直觉与间接认知的天然差异也造成微观与宏观空间的认知偏差,人类行为与心理的不确定性限定了认知能力,这都限制了空间规律的泛化能力,伴生了误用甚至滥用各类修辞的现象。因此,有必要通过空间尺度转换检验各类修辞,优化城乡空间的认知方法,回到事物自身,从而逐步接近而非远离真相。此外,也有必要适当超越实用与问题导向,持续增强规划理论的基础性与纯粹性。

There are many theoretical sources of urban planning, and many rhetorical devices of other disciplines are used in planning compilation and research. These rhetorical devices have certain functions, but intentionally or unintentionally epoche the spatial scale. The suspension of spatial scale implies the epistemology of reductionism. In the horizontal dimension, it selectively strengthens some features while neglecting the ubiquitous interaction; in the vertical dimension, it ignores the incommensurability and ergodicity of spatial laws in multiple scales. In pursuit of the root, the concepts and theoretical presuppositions from the fields of physics, biology and architecture affect the cognitive process, intuitive intuition and indirect cognition also cause the differences between micro and macro, and the knowability of human behavior and psychology is relatively limited. These factors limit the generalization ability of spatial laws, accompanied by misuse and even abuse of all kinds of rhetoric. Therefore, it is necessary to test all kinds of rhetoric through the spatial scale transformation, optimize the cognitive methods of urban and rural space, return to things themselves, and gradually approach rather than stay away from the truth. In addition, it is also necessary to go beyond the practical and problem oriented, and gradually enhance the foundation and purity of planning theory.