| 1,454 | 2 | 517 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
自2018年乡村振兴战略实施以来，政府或资本主导下的乡村振兴面临多重困境与挑战，亟须关注和研究可持续型乡村振兴模式及其内在治理机制。浙江北部地区作为我国乡村振兴示范引领区，近年来兴起了由地方政府、市场主体与村集体多方合作，形成以“基金+运营”为特征的中介化治理模式。基于新经济社会学嵌入性理论，笔者构建了乡村振兴中介化治理机制的理论分析框架，从组织嵌入、制度嵌入与社会嵌入三个维度，结合案例阐释乡村振兴下的中介化治理机制。研究认为：组织嵌入提供了多方协作与博弈的桥梁；制度嵌入确保多方实现激励相容；社会嵌入则充分发挥了乡贤及其社会资本的治理主体性。乡村振兴应关注治理所根植的乡村社会场域，重视自下而上的发展路径，构建更为地方化的运行机制，以实现乡村振兴的可持续性。
Abstract：Since the implementation of rural revitalization strategy in 2018, rural revitalization led by government and capital has faced multiple dilemmas and risks, and it is urgent to pay attention to and study sustainable rural revitalization models and internal mechanisms. As a demonstration and leading area of rural revitalization in China, the intermediary governance model of “fund + operation” has emerged in Zhejiang Province in recent years through the cooperation among local government, market players and village collectives. Based on the embedding theory of new economic sociology, a theoretical analysis framework of the governance mechanism of rural revitalization is constructed, and an attempt is made to explain the mediated governance mechanism of rural revitalization from three dimensions: network and collaborations, institutional embeddedness and social embeddedness, combined with cases. The study concludes that organizational embeddedness provides a bridge for multi-party collaboration and game; institutional embeddedness ensures the incentive compatibility of multiparty; and social embeddedness gives full play to the governance subjectivity of villagers and their social capital. Rural revitalization should pay attention to the rural social field in which governance is rooted, attach importance to both government-led and community-based development paths, and build more appropriate strategies and mechanisms to achieve sustainability in rural revitalization.
[1]焦长权,周飞舟.“资本下乡”与村庄的再造[J].中国社会科学,2016(1):100-116, 205-206.
[2]张京祥,王京海.资本驱动下乡村复兴的反思与模式建构：基于济南市唐王镇两个典型村庄的比较[J].国际城市规划, 2016, 31:121-127.
[3]张领.合作治理:乡村振兴战略中治理有效的一种模式[J].探索,2022(2):89-102.
[4]宋涛,赵燕菁.地权分置、资本下乡与乡村振兴:基于公共服务的视角[J].社会科学战线, 2022(1):41-50.
[5]周飞舟，王绍琛.农民上楼与资本下乡:城镇化的社会学研究[J].中国社会科学, 2015(1):66-83.
[6]王春超,吕亚荣.工商业资本进入农业与农村的土地流转问题研究[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 51:62-68.
[7]丁波.资本下乡中村企合作治理的逻辑与机制[J].农村经济, 2022(10):64-70.
[8]曹斌.乡村振兴的日本实践:背景、措施与启示[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):117-129.
[9]黄璜,杨贵庆,菲利普·米塞尔维茨,等.“后乡村城镇化”与乡村振兴:当代德国乡村规划探索及对中国的启示[J].城市规划, 2017, 41(11):111-119.
[10]波兰尼卡尔.巨变:当代政治与经济的起源[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2013.
[11]GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure:the problem of embeddedness[J]. American journal of sociology, 1985, 91(3):481-510.
[12]DIMAGGIO P. Cultural aspects of economic action and organization[M]//ROGER F, ROBERTSON A, eds. Beyond the marketplace. New York:Routledge, 1990:24.
[13]DIMAGGIO P. Culture and economy[M]//SMELSER N, SWEDBERG R.Handbook of economic sociology. Princeton:Princeton University Press and Russell Sage, 1994:27-57.
[14]ZUKIN S, DIMAGGIO P. Structures of capital:the social organization of the economy[M]. Cambridge, the UK:Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[15]冯灿芳,张京祥,陈浩.嵌入性治理:法团主义视角的中国新城空间开发研究[J].国际城市规划, 2018, 33(6):102-109.
[16]李广斌,李雅妮,周敏,等. 2000年以来乡村工业分散发展机理研究:基于后乡土嵌入性的视角[J].城市规划, 2023, 47(2):94-100.
[17]SHEN M, SHEN J. Governing the countr yside through st ate-led programmes:a case study of Jiangning District in Nanjing, China[J]. Urban studies, 2018, 55(7):1439-1459.
[18]刘守英,熊雪锋.中国乡村治理的制度与秩序演变:一个国家治理视角的回顾与评论[J].农业经济问题, 2018(9):10-23.
[19]郐艳丽.乡村管理走向乡村治理[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2017.
[20]施德浩,陈浩,于涛.城市要素下乡与乡村治理变迁:乡村振兴的路径之辩[J].城市规划学刊, 2019(6):107-113.
[21]LORENDAHL B. New cooperatives and local development:a study of six cases in J??mtland, Sweden[J]. Journal of rural studies, 1996, 12:143-150.
[22]FRANKS J R, GLOIN A M. Environmental co-operatives as instruments for delivering across-farm environmental and rural policy objectives:lessons for the UK[J]. Journal of rural studies, 2007, 23:472-489.
[23]PHYNE J, HOVGAARD G, HANSEN G. Norwegian salmon goes to market:the case of the Austevoll seafood cluster[J]. Journal of rural studies,2006, 22(2):190-204.
[24]MURDOCH J. Networks-a new paradigm of rural development?[J]. Journal of rural studies, 2000, 16(4):407-419.
[25]KALANTARIDIS C, BIKA Z. Local Embeddedness and rural entrepreneurship:case-study evidence from Cumbria, England[J]. Environment and planning a:economy and space, 2006, 38(8):1561-1579.
[26]王名,张雪.双向嵌入:社会组织参与社区治理自主性的一个分析框架[J].南通大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 35(2):49-57.
[27]陈晓运.群团组织、竞合式镶嵌与统合主义的运作[J].青年研究,2015(6):19-27, 91.
[28]黄中伟,王宇露.关于经济行为的社会嵌入理论研究述评[J].外国经济与管理, 2007(12):1-8.
[29]刘世定.嵌入性与关系合同[J].社会学研究, 1999(4):77-90.
[30]刘彦随.中国新时代城乡融合与乡村振兴[J].地理学报, 2018, 73(4):637-650.
[31]孙莹.协同共治视角下的乡村治理现代化:以四川省J市的乡村振兴实践为例[J].理论学刊, 2022(2):128-136.
[32]申明锐.从乡村建设到乡村运营:政府项目市场托管的成效与困境[J].城市规划, 2020, 44(7):9-17.
[33]费孝通.乡土中国生育制度乡土重建[M].北京:商务印书馆, 2011:6-9.
[34]杨洁莹,张京祥.基于法团主义视角的“资本下乡”利益格局检视与治理策略:江西省婺源县H村的实证研究[J].国际城市规划, 2020,35(5):98-105.
[35]韩庆龄.嵌入理论下资源型乡贤返乡参与乡村产业振兴的实践机理[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2023, 23(2):94-102.
[36]贺雪峰,桂华,夏柱智.论土地制度改革的方向与思路:《土地管理法修正案(草案)》解读[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2019,19(4):1-7.
[37]HENDERSON J, DICKEN P, HESS M, et al. Global production networks and the analysis of economic development[J]. Review of international political economy, 2002, 9(3):436-464.
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2023.665
中图分类号:D422.6;F327
引用信息:
[1]寿敏好,郭旭,郑哲予,等.嵌入性视角下乡村振兴中介化治理机制研究——以浙北为例[J].国际城市规划,2026,41(01):68-74+110.DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2023.665.
基金信息:
浙江省社科规划“党的二十届三中全会和省委十五届五次全会精神研究阐释”专项课题“国土空间规划体系下杭州都市区土地一级发展权配置失衡的测度、机制与优化”（86）; 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“产权强度对集体建设用地减量规划实施的影响机制与政策优化”（23YJCZH065）; 国家社科基金重大项目“面向乡村产业振兴的土地利用转型研究”（23&ZD114）; 国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目“浙北地区专业化运营乡村振兴模式研究：评价体系、绩效风险与政策建议”（202313021022）; 浙大城市学院数字乡村研究中心2023—2024年度课题“浙江省跨乡镇土地综合整治助推城乡融合的机制研究：以湖州为例”（01）
2024-05-22
2024-05-22
2024-05-22