| 1,090 | 1 | 334 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
大都市地区紧密型的城乡关系在为远郊乡村振兴带来机遇的同时也带来了挑战。香港作为紧密型城乡关系的典型代表，其远郊乡村振兴的成功经验或可为同类地区提供借鉴。因此，本文选取香港荔枝窝村为案例，通过实地调研、访谈与文献研究的方法分析该村以生态文化价值为基础、重塑城乡链接的振兴路径与特点。研究发现：荔枝窝主要是通过多元主体共建重建乡村与城市的互动关系，探索出一条香港本土乡村的可持续发展模式；与此同时，乡村振兴既需要城乡关系的重新调整、多元主体的沟通协作，也需要人与村庄空间的互动和相互影响。我国内地也在积极探索多元主体参与乡村振兴，基于荔枝窝的经验，笔者提出主体多元化、资金多样化和项目长线化三点建议，以期为内地多元主体参与大都市地区的乡村振兴提供启发。
Abstract：A tight urban-rural relation in metropolitan area brings both opportunities and challenges to the revitalization of villages in exurban zones. As a representative metropolitan city, Hong Kong is characterized by an intensive urban–rural interface whose experience offers useful insights for other similar area. This paper selects Lai Chi Wo, a village in Hong Kong, as a case study. Drawing on data collected through field researches, interviews, and online literature, this paper examines the village's revitalization path and characteristics that is based on ecological and cultural value of the village as well as reconnecting rural and urban areas. This paper finds that Lai Chi Wo's revitalization explores a sustainable development model for Hong Kong's rural villages, which are mainly achieved through the joint efforts of multiple stakeholders, rebuilding interactions between rural and urban areas; in the meantime, it is found that rural revitalization requires reorganization of the urban-rural relation and to establish dynamics among various stakeholders as well as between human and rural space. China's mainland is also actively exploring multi-actor participation in rural revitalization. Based on the case study, this paper puts forward suggestions to encourage multiple participants, to diversity funding and to prolong the length of revitalization programs with the aim of providing insights for strengthening multi-stakeholders' participations in rural revitalization within Chinese mainland's metropolitan areas.
[1]吴惠芳,陈健,王惠,等.多元主体参与乡村建设实践路径与效能的比较研究[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2022, 39(1):62-74.
[2]丁国胜,彭科,王伟强,等.中国乡村建设的类型学考察：基于乡村建设者的视角[J].城市发展研究, 2016, 23(10):60-66.
[3]姚树荣,周诗雨.乡村振兴的共建共治共享路径研究[J].中国农村经济,2020(2):14-29.
[4]郁建兴,高翔.地方发展型政府的行为逻辑及制度基础[J].中国社会科学, 2012(5):95-112, 206-207.
[5]孙莹,张尚武.乡村建设的治理机制及其建设效应研究：基于浙江奉化四个乡村建设案例的比较[J].城市规划学刊, 2021(1):44-51.
[6]杨怡,王万平.乡村振兴战略下农村社区的多元主体共建：基于佛堂村的调查研究[J].大理大学学报, 2022, 7(1):34-41.
[7]白雪娇.社会共治嵌入高质量乡村建设的逻辑语境、实践过程与效能分析：基于“新村”的案例研究[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023, 45(2):113-121.
[8]储金龙,滕璐,李久林,等.多元主体在乡村治理中的作用过程与驱动要素研究[J].小城镇建设, 2022, 40(2):5-12, 20.
[9]民政部国家乡村振兴局.民政部国家乡村振兴局关于动员引导社会组织参与乡村振兴工作的通知_国务院部门文件_中国政府网[EB/OL].[2023-08-03]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-03/01/content_5676306.htm.
[10]殷清眉,栾峰.大都市地区乡村振兴的多元行动者介入模式及启示：以上海首批乡村振兴示范村为例[J].城市发展研究, 2022, 29(8):93-98.
[11]叶敏,张海晨.紧密型城乡关系与大都市郊区的乡村振兴形态：对上海城乡关系与乡村振兴经验的解读与思考[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 19(5):33-40, 155.
[12]AMANOR-BOADU V, AMANOR-BOADU Y, DYER G. Challenging cognitive barriers to rural revitalization in an internet economy[C/OL]//Proceedings of the IAMA Conference. Sydney:IAMA, 2001:27-28. https://www.agrifood.info/Agrifood/members/Congress/Congress2001Papers/Symposium/Amanor-Boadu.pdf.
[13]PITZEL G, BENAVIDEZ A, BIANCHI B, et al. Rural revitalization in New Mexico[J]. The rural educator, 2007, 28(3):4-11.
[14]MEYER D F. Exploration of solutions for revitalisation of rural areas in South Africa[J/OL]. Mediterranean journal of social sciences, 2014[2023-11-29]. https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/2253.
[15]张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.超越线性转型的乡村复兴：基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较[J].经济地理, 2015, 35(3):1-8.
[16]WILLIAMS J M, CHU V, LAM W F, et al. Building resilient rural communities:a summary of the case study and prospects beyond Lai Chi Wo and Hong Kong[M/OL]//WILLIAMS J M, CHU V, LAM W F, et al.Revitalising rural communities. Singapore:Springer, 2021:83-94[2023-03-19]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5824-2_4.
[17]CHU V H Y, LAW W W Y, WILLIAMS J M. Advocacy coalitions in rural revitalisation:the roles of policy brokers and policy learning[J].Environmental science&policy, 2022, 136:9-18.
[18]香港特别行政区政府规划署.香港土地用途2023[EB/OL].[2025-12-06].https://www.pland.gov.hk/pland_tc/info_serv/open_data/landu/.
[19]香港规划标准与准则：第10章自然保育及文物保育[S/OL].[2025-12-06]. https://www.pland.gov.hk/file/tech_doc/hkpsg/full/pdf/ch10_tc.pdf.
[20]香港特别行政区地政总署.在新界小型屋宇政策下之认可乡村名册.(2009)[2023-03-05]. https://www.landsd.gov.hk/tc/land-disposaltransaction/village-houses-NT.html.
[21]阎凯,沈清基.香港郊野公园阶段特征与管制机制研究[J].国际城市规划, 2019, 34(3):124-131.
[22]HAYES J. The great difference:Hong Kong’s new territories and its people1898-2004[M]. Hong Kong:Hong Kong University Press, 2012.
[23]JIMA C Y. Rural blight and land use planning in Hong Kong[J].Environmentalist, 1997, 17(4):269-281.
[24]HOPKINSON L, LAO M L. Rethinking the small house policy[R/OL].Hong Kong:civic exchange, 2003[2023-03-05]. https://civic-exchange.org/dev/wp-content/uploads/2003/09/47-200309LAND_RethinkSmallHouse_en.pdf.
[25]LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. Small House Policy[R/OL].(2018)[2023-03-05]. https://www.legco.gov.hk/research-publications/english/essentials-1516ise10-small-house-policy.htm.
[26]The World Bank Group. Rural population(%of total population)-Hong Kong SAR, China|Data[EB/OL].(2018)[2023-03-05]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=HK&page=1.
[27]HUI E C, YEUNG S C, LUNG H, et al. Rural land use strategy in Hong Kong[C]//12th Asian Real Estate Society(AsRES)annual conference and the 2007 AREUEA international conference. Macau, China, 2007.
[28]財務委員會.工務小組委員會討論文件：目707—新市鎮及市區發展.(1997-02-19). https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr96-97/chinese/fc/pwsc/papers/pw19024a.htm.
[29]香港特别行政区政府渔农自然护理署. New nature conser vation policy[EB/OL].[2023-12-11]. https://sc.afcd.gov.hk/gb/www.afcd.gov.hk/tc_chi/conservation/con_nncp/con_nncp.html.
[30]申明锐.香港还有农业、农民吗？[J/OL].凤凰品城市, 2016[2023-11-09]. http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzA3NDQxODg5Nw==&mi d=2650108810&idx=1&sn=ac181133546dcc2aad34284287e925f6&chk sm=8701cc34b07645228b2a2e92fd4c66efe96460872dea4cb7b7fa689b4c bc426fc8f11e59a0d8#rd.
[31]THEMEPUNCH. Rural Sustainability永續鄉郊計劃[EB/OL].[2023-03-05]. https://ccsg.hku.hk/ruralsd/en/.
[32]客家生活體驗村@荔枝窩[EB/OL].[2023-03-07]. https://lcwhakkalife.wixsite.com/hakkalifeprogram/zh.
[33]UNESCO Asia-Pacific Awards for cultural heritage conservation 2020[R/OL].[2023-12-11]. https://articles.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2023/06/2020-winners_0.pdf?TSPD_101_R0=080713870fab200034a6e8fc297a7c33a00c4cc16b9995e27d37724a041f9dd1c3dae09c37a362f7081cf2c91014300000da870c820d724839a273f278e9de0a550fb16a11e8021a7c65a50282a7ce03be6c8b1a870e87a6b39387d005299d4b.
[34]香港特别行政区政府.荔枝窩、小灘及三椏村分區計劃大綱草圖獲核准[EB/OL].[2025-12-06]. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201602/19/P201602190459.htm.
[35]香港特别行政区政府.荔枝窩、小灘及三椏村分區計劃大綱核准圖編號S/NE-LCW/2[R/OL].[2025-12-06]. https://www.ozp.tpb.gov.hk/api/Plan/Plan Note?plan No=S%2f NE-LCW%2f2&lang=TC&ext=pdf&d Type=in.
[36]香港特别行政区政府.荔枝窝、小滩及三桠村分区规划大纲图地图[EB/OL].[2025-12-06]. https://www.ozp.tpb.gov.hk/?page=search&search Type=AdvSearch&type=plan&caseNo=S%2FNE-LCW%2F2&layers=ozp-1&lang=tc.
[37]香港大学社会科学学院策动永续发展坊.荔志[M].香港大学社会科学学院策动永续发展坊, 2017.
[38]绿田园基金. Produce Green Foundation[EB/OL].[2023-12-02]. http://www.producegreen.org.hk/about_us.htm.
[39]长春社. The Conservancy Association[EB/OL].[2023-12-02]. https://cahk.org.hk/zh-hant/about/5/.
[40]香港大学公民社会与治理研究中心.永续城乡—汇丰永续乡郊计划的九年旅程[M].香港:香港大学公民社会与治理研究中心, 2023.
[41]陈锐,王红扬,钱慧.治理结构视角的“乡村建设实验”特征考察[J].现代城市研究, 2016(10):9-15.
[42]豆岚雨,申明锐.乡村规划之后：国企下乡运营的强制通行现象与可持续悖论[J].国际城市规划, 2023, 38(4):114-121.
[43]LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. Report of the Subcommittee on Country Parks(Designation)(Consolidation)(Amendment)Order 2017:LC Paper No.CB(1)164/17-18[R/OL].(2017)[2023-03-04]. https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr17-18/english/hc/papers/hc20171027cb1-164-e.pdf.
[44]指定荔枝窩特別地區[EB/OL].[2025-12-06]. https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200412/15/1215106.htm.
(1)根据2017年数据，这类村落中已有52个被纳入分区计划大纲图规划范围，6个被纳入郊野公园条例管控范围[43]。
(2) 1983年，一宗具有里程碑意义的法院判决--Melhado Case（生发案），被认为对香港的农村土地使用格局产生了深远影响。案件的核心是：私人土地所有者是否可以在乡郊农地上进行非农业用途（如货柜存放、露天仓储），而不违反政府的管制规定。法院裁定，在没有明文规划控制下的土地上，业主可自由决定其使用方式，只要不违反现行法律。这一裁决实际上认可了尚未实施具体法定规划区域中的土地可以被灵活、甚至任意使用。之后，大量非农业用途开始侵入香港新界农地，包括露天仓储、集装箱堆场、临时工厂等[23]。
(1)笔者在香港香郊基金实习期间（2017年6月-8月）参与了村宅修复的工作。
(2)荔枝窝是庆春约成员之一。“约”是新界联盟的名称，负责其下属村落的宗教和教育等公共事务。庆春约是沙头角地区的十约之一。
(3)荔枝窝特别地区为荔枝窝风水林的一部分，2004年荔枝窝（特别地区）令将荔枝窝风水林的一部分指定为特别地区，以更好地保护风水林林地，使其免受开发及与环境不协调的人为活动所破坏[44]。
(1)“房”为客家家族体系里区分宗族分支的称呼。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19830/j.upi.2023.132
中图分类号:D422.6;F299.27;F327
引用信息:
[1]胡一诺.多元主体共建的大都市远郊乡村振兴路径探索——以香港荔枝窝村为例[J].国际城市规划,2026,41(01):75-82.DOI:10.19830/j.upi.2023.132.
2024-04-23
2024-04-23
2024-04-23